Browse Search Popular Register Upload Rules User list Login:
Search:
Damper Comparison

Image:
screenshot of the scene

Author: egkteam

Group: Default

Filesize: 0.5 MB

Date added: 2012-06-06

Rating: 5

Downloads: 452

Views: 554

Comments: 3

Ratings: 1

Times favored: 0

Made with: Algodoo v2.0.2

Tags:

Scene tag

Which one damps collision the most??:huh:
Please log in to rate this scene
edit
Similar scenes
Title: air+oil suspension,damper
Rating: 5
Filesize: 34.37 kB
Downloads: 448
Comments: 0
Ratings: 1
Date added: 2017/10/07 11:30:56
Made with: Algodoo v2.1.0
Rating: rated 5
download
Title: Tower with Mass Damper and earthquake(Destructible)
Rating: 7.0834
Filesize: 289.1 kB
Downloads: 3435
Comments: 1
Ratings: 6
Date added: 2009/05/11 06:04:38
Made with: Phun
Rating: rated 7.1
download
Title: Hydraulic Damper
Rating: 5
Filesize: 350.13 kB
Downloads: 969
Comments: 0
Ratings: 1
Date added: 2012/10/01 11:44:40
Made with: Algodoo v2.0.1 Edu
Rating: rated 5
download
Title: Star Size Comparison
Rating: 5.375
Filesize: 48.77 kB
Downloads: 6774
Comments: 9
Ratings: 2
Date added: 2023/12/15 19:20:02
Made with: Algodoo v2.1.0
Rating: rated 5.4
download
Title: SAS-Shock Absorber system- Mk2
Rating: 5
Filesize: 48.47 kB
Downloads: 101
Comments: 2
Ratings: 3
Date added: 2008/10/12 01:18:15
Made with: Phun
no image found for this scene
Rating: rated 5
download
Title: some size comparison
Rating: 5
Filesize: 14.16 MB
Downloads: 10250
Comments: 2
Ratings: 1
Date added: 2024/11/11 00:39:28
Made with: Algodoo v2.2.2
Rating: rated 5
download
the #1 damper absorbs the most energy, and thus is the most effective damper. #2 absorbs the least amount of energy, and thus is the least effective. I suspect that the multi-piece barrier of #3 contributes to its higher effectiveness than #2, due to friction rubbing of the separate pieces during collision
YES YES THANKS_o_ _o_
#1 damps the collision the most, is the least effective, and absorbs the least energy.
#2 is the most effective, and absorbs the most energy.
#3 damps the collision the least, is almost as effective as #2, and absorbs slightly less energy than #2.

I judged effectiveness based on maximum deceleration value. The lower the value, the less trauma to the car occupants, the higher the effectiveness.

I measured the energy absorbed by plotting the energy for the dampers.

I judged the damping by the total travel of the cars after impact. The greater the travel, the lower the damping.